Hi Neeno, I've seen the use of Zebra ( vision ) ROLLUP blinds with one for each side that will cover down to the lower half window rather than having four blinds and have them fitted to the outside top edge and to the side edges of the pelmets ( window frames.) (If you get to see utube video clips your see what I mean . ) The avantage of doing it that way will allow you to buy only two blinds rather than four . The cost difference between two blinds and extra fabric required to cover the two windows will most likely be cheaper than the extra cost of two extra roll tube mechanism / chains etc etc. when fitted in the recesses of the windows . Also ,due to the bulkeness of blinds , two would no doubt look better than four doing it the way I suggested . Fitting to the timber edges will offer a couple of advantages . One of which will clear the windout handles fitted to the opening widows . Two ,will offer better light reduction from night time lights as the blinds will cover right to frame edges. Three , the design of the Zebra blinds only requires a few inches of the chain movement to close up or open up for vision out or add privacy where normal blockout ROLLUP blinds needs more adjustments and will not offer the same privacy options that the Zebra blinds can offer . Also, if in bed you can open the Zebra blinds slightly by a few inches or roll up just above the top of the lower window ,depending on how much vision and privacy you need and look out of the window whilst still in bed. Being such narrow windows, the small bit of wall between them proberly would not mater if one blind fitted at the top came down over that wall area down to the bottom window. Also you should concider the solar film tinting to offer improved privacy and insulation & fade protection etc for when blinds or even curtains etc are opened up altogether . Although I'm in Tasmania , I have a manufacturer I deal with on the mainland that could arrange sale / installation if required using the Zebra blinds or other types as well contacts for window

Hi Siriuskey, They are timber looking tiles - we absolutely love them. We are considering the same for the new place but potentially herringbone/parquetry arrangement. Much more expensive vs. laminate but easier to clean and no concern in relation to water...

Flip up and bi-fold are indeed "all or nothing" options that can be tricky to screen too. Both also rely heavily on well-engineered operating mechanisms and as such come with increased potential for problems. I once stayed in a house on North Stradbroke Island which had a large flip up gas strut supported timber framed window over the north facing kitchen sink with views to Cape Moreton. (I now wish I had a photo to share, but sadly I was too much in the moment to take any.) Standing at the sink, looking north over the Coral Sea with Humpback whales breaching in the distance was one of those forever moments. Plus, our elevated situation seemed to reduce the number of insects that came through the unscreenable window. In that case I wouldn't have compromised on spending to get that window out of the way. For just about every other context I would opt for a less complex, less costly, screenable, servery style window.

Are you sure that they are terracotta roof tiles? They look like concrete tiles to me. If you look from underneath (in your attic) terracotta tiles are clay orange underneath, whereas concrete ones are grey. If they are concrete tiles then paint them. If they are terracotta tiles then leave them and paint your awnings to match. Painting your awnings to match is easier and cheaper than painting a tiled roof. Best of luck, Dr Retro of Dr Retro House Calls/Dr Retro Virtual Visits