POLL: Would you go black?
Luke Buckle
7 years ago
YES! Love!
NO - that's crazy talk
Other (please explain below)
Featured Answer
Sort by:Oldest
Comments (32)
HughVF
7 years agolast modified: 7 years agoBetty Weaver
7 years agoRelated Discussions
What style ottoman to go with our black leather sofa?
Comments (7)I do like your idea of an ottoman instead of a traditional coffee table. Since you have a fairly mod/hip style going, you should find something equal. I do like the one that is tufted all around but of course in some other color for your room. Something low and sleek....See MorePOLL: Would you rather a freestanding kitchen bin or under-sink bin?
Comments (15)Under sink bin added when we moved to our home 18 years ago as there was not a lot of floor room. Opening door was awkward. However now with an updated kitchen it was suggested to have pull out bin in island bench. Chop food on bench then scraps into bins. Too easy. It is practical, more room to move around work zones with re configuration. If you empty regularly it is not a problem with odour and part of the integrated design. Its clever cabinetry....See MoreWould you go black?
Comments (3)To answer your first question- about black tops and sink/tap colour. Too much black- black sinks are modern and edgey, not provincial style. I'd go with a white butler sink (or maybe copper butler sink??). Same answer again for tapware- too much black. Check out Astra Walker range of tapware- really wide range of finishes. I've just installed a tuscan bronze tap. It's gorgeous....love, love, love! Regarding different bench tops between kitchen and butler pantry. I think this is up to you. I guess I'd consider the amount of light in the pantry, and if no window, probably try and keep it as light as possible....See MorePOLL: How important is using sustainable materials to you?
Comments (15)As an architect, I have previously been taught that creating a sustainable home is about designing it so that living in it lowers energy and water use. This is achieved through designing for orientation, using thermal mass and specifying fixtures and finishes that are low impact, reuse water on site, etc. However, the latest research is showing that this is not enough to impact the rate of climate change. And that what we build from needs to be considered in order to make a dent. This is because the timeframe required to see the benefits of sustainable living in a home, is a longer play than the upfront construction from low tox, low energy, minimal footprint materials and methodologies. It has to be a two-pronged approach. Choose materials and products, and constructing efficiently with low energy and low waste. Having carbon neutral homes. And designing homes that over the long term, are low in energy and water consumption, and support the health and well-being of the occupants. A project was established in mid 2017, called “The Building Code Energy Performance Trajectory Project”. It involved the Sustainable Built Environment Council and ClimateWorks Australia, and is described as an industry-led initiative seeking improvements to energy requirements in the National Construction Code. The report was released recently, and what was amazing in this report was to read that 58% of Australia’s buildings in 2050, will be built after 2019 … which means that there’s huge potential to impact their performance and the environment through better energy requirements. And these energy requirements have not been rigorously updated since 2010, despite electricity prices having doubled over that time. Detached housing will comprise 64% of the new construction between 2019 and 2050. So every homeowner has the opportunity to seriously change the landscape of energy use and efficiency in our country. There’s some sectors of the industry really pushing back against this … largely because they believe it will dramatically dent their profit margins to have to build houses with higher star ratings. Australian homes, on average, perform very poorly, and our expectations are super low. Steve Baczek, an American architect, said something about American houses that I think sums it up for Australia as well ... “It’s not that High-Performance Houses cost too much; it’s that our idea of a fairly priced home is based on a history of building houses to meet embarrassingly low performance benchmarks. Clients don’t realise the difference between built to code vs built to last”....See MorePMG Design
7 years agojunipergirl
7 years agoUser
7 years agoPMG Design
7 years agoJane McKay
7 years agoIris Spittle
7 years agoruthfay
7 years agochrisandjanelle
7 years agosslorach
7 years agoruthfay
7 years agoannb1997
7 years agowendan26
7 years agoLynley Jenness
7 years agohelendyjak
7 years agoIris Spittle
7 years agoruthfay
7 years agohelendyjak
7 years agoGood Taste
7 years ago
Jane McKay